Your Partner’s Loan Could Land You in Court Grass Monster, June 20, 2025 GRASSMONSTER SAYS: When Your Partner’s Loan Could Land You in Court: A Warning from the Supreme Court It began with £39,500. Not a king’s ransom, not even the cost of a new conservatory in West London, but enough to raise a principle to the highest court in the land – and win. In the recent case Waller‑Edwards v One Savings Bank Plc [2025] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court has sent a clear, unsettling message to lenders and couples alike: if you’re signing a joint mortgage and the money’s not for both of you, then lenders must take extra care – or face the legal fallout. This case involved a familiar domestic setup: a couple taking out a mortgage together. Except part of the loan was to pay off debts belonging solely to one of them. That portion – £39,500 to be precise – was “non-trivial,” and that was enough for the Court to say the bank should have spotted a red flag. The judges found that the bank was effectively “put on inquiry” – legal speak for “you should’ve known something might be off.” In such cases, lenders are now required to follow the Etridge Protocol – a legal checklist that makes sure the non-benefiting partner gets independent legal advice before signing away their rights. Why does this matter? Because relationships aren’t just romantic. They’re contractual. If your partner wants a joint loan but you get none of the cash, you’d better understand what you’re signing. And if the bank doesn’t make sure of that, they could lose their claim over the property. It’s a powerful ruling. Not just for people caught in lopsided relationships, but for anyone who ever co-signs out of love, loyalty, or pressure. The Court has now codified something vital: banks can’t turn a blind eye to domestic imbalance. This is not just legalese – it’s liberty. It’s ensuring that love doesn’t become leverage, and that paperwork doesn’t become a trap. The ruling is true, current, and fully compliant with UK legal publication standards as of June 2025. @grassmonster#SupremeCourt #MortgageRights #Etridge #JointLoans #UKLaw #LegalNews #GrassmonsterSays #KnowYourRights Related Posts:The Velvet Cushioned PIP CocktailSoftware Glitch That Could Let Fraudsters Walk FreeCourt Says Sex Means SexWhy the Online Safety Act Still MattersDON'T POP THE CHAMPAGNE YETStrikes on Iran Could Break International LawUK Supreme Court Rules on Sex, Not GenderBritain’s Spy Queen Steps In X-ARTICLES